An new European-wide package for ISPs has been discussed before, but new amendments could turn European Internet Service Providers into copyright police. Perhaps the only good news out of this is that network neutrality activism may get a new boost in Europe.The disturbing report comes right out of todays posting on EDRI.org, a European Digital rights activism website. The amendments just about speak for themselves and can be found here. Here's a few of them: "Article 2 – point 5 a (new) amending Directive 2002/58/EC Article 14 – paragraph 1 1. In implementing the provisions of this Directive, Member States shall ensure, subject to paragraphs 2 and 3, that no mandatory requirements for specific technical features, including, without limitation, for the purpose of detecting, intercepting or preventing infringement of intellectual property rights by users, are imposed on terminal or other electronic communication equipment which could impede the placing of equipment on the market and the free circulation of such equipment in and between Member States." Paragraph 1 and 2: 2. Where provisions of this Directive can be implemented only by Here's another amendment: Article 1 – point 12 xx amending Directive 2002/22/EC Article 21 – paragraph 4a (new) So basically, they are demanding mandatory notice-and-takedown systems run by the ISP and paid for by the government. It would definitely make the job of the copyright industry a lot easier to have state sponsored copyright police run by the ISP. One has to wonder how ISPs are suppose to "[prevent] infringement of intellectual property rights by users" outside of an outright ban on file-sharing entirely given that encryption and restricted access p2p (ala private P2P websites) has become increasingly adopted by the file-sharing community at large. What about blocking YouTube? Would that be considered a preventative measure? The amendments go even further with this: Without prejudice to national rules in conformity with community law promoting cultural and media policy objectives, such as cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism, national regulatory authorities and other relevant authorities shall also as far as appropriate promote cooperation between undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services and the sectors interested in the protection and promotion of lawful content in electronic communication networks and services. These co-operation mechanisms may also include coordination of the public interest information to be made available as set out in Article 21(4a) and Article 20(2). How can kowtowing a dying business model be more obvious in legislation with "the protection and promotion of lawful content in electronic communication networks and services"? La Quadrature du Net, the website that has a large amount of information on the matter has some ways of stopping these amendments from becoming European law: Contact your MEPs and their assistants before July 7th, the date of the vote in IMCO and ITRE committee, to inform them that the "Telecoms Package" amendements are dangerous for users' freedom and harmful to network neutrality Ask them to drop or reject the amendments related to Intellectual Property Rights, which are completly unrelated to the Telecoms Package. All the MEPs need to be contacted to prepare themselves to vote against the rapporteurs and draftspersons proposals on September, if such amendements are voted on July 7th. European citizens have until the 7th to contact their MEPs (Member of European Parliament) and voice their concerns. From EDRI: Some amendments will transform the ISPs from technical intermediaries that have no obligation to prior surveillance of contents into law enforcers. Therefore they might be asked to block their users from lawful activities in the interests of their security or to work with content producers and rights-holders' organizations, including sending intimidating messages, with no judicial approval. The amendment meant to support Intellectual Property Rights owners could open the door to censorship and might mean in practice the loss on privacy on the Internet. Protests over the new "telecom package" have already taken place in Germany. Open Rights Group is also covering the story: Could Europe be drafting a new law to disconnect suspected filesharers from the internet? MEPs have already signalled their condemnation of this approach. But last-minute amendments to telecommunications legislation could bring the so-called “3 strikes” approach in by the backdoor. If you want your MEP to stick to their guns on 3 strikes, write to them today to voice your concerns. Wiki for La Quadrature du Net (features pages in both English and French) Home page for Quadrature du Net |
|
members that voted for this story
|










http://www.laquadrature.net/